Governance Review

Table Tennis England has committed to produce a wide-ranging and thorough Review into the governance and structures of Table Tennis England.

February 2019 Update:

The Members’ Advisory Group (MAG), one of the key recommendations of the Independent Review Panel, has now been set up, with 12 members appointed.

The main role of MAG is to provide strategic advice to the Board, as well as providing a channel by which the table tennis community can raise strategic issues to be considered by the Board.

Click here to read more.

What is the Governance Review?

Table Tennis England has committed to produce a wide-ranging and thorough Review into its governance and structures, with an aim to achieve a modernised, professional, transparent organisation that balances the need for democracy and a volunteer workforce at its heart.

A Governance Review Group (GRG) and an Independent Review Panel (IRP) will report periodically to the Board, which in turn will provide updates to National Council and the wider membership.

Central to the Review will be the opportunity for any individual member, club or league to be part of the consultation process so that all views can be taken into account.

Governance Review Group (GRG)

The Governance Review Group is the Board sub-group which will oversee the process, procedure and timetable of the review.

The GRG is chaired by Senior Independent Director Mark Quartermaine and also includes Table Tennis England Chairman Sandra Deaton and Chief Executive Sara Sutcliffe, plus the Chair of National Council Tony Catt and the Chair of Rules Committee’s delegate Estyn Williams.

Independent Review Panel (IRP)

The Independent Review Panel (IRP) will lead the Review.

IRP members’ skills include governance, legal, membership bodies, communications, different NGB structures and table tennis.

The first stage of selection process for the IRP was to recruit an Independent Review Panel Chair, Marc Mazzucco. Following an open recruitment process, the rest of the panel, which includes three individuals from within the sport, was named.

Click here to read more about the panel members

Interim Report

The first stage of the Review was an open consultation process. Following that, the Interim Report has now been published and can be read below.

Final Report

The final report from Phase One of the review has been published, along with the Board’s response.


Total Attachments: 12

Members Advisory Group Committee Terms of Reference

Type: pdf
Size: 115 KB

Members Advisory Group Terms of Reference

Type: pdf
Size: 263 KB

Members Advisory Group role description and application process

Type: pdf
Size: 782 KB

Voting and Company Membership Review Committee Terms of Reference

Type: pdf
Size: 420 KB

Phase One Final Report July 2018

Type: pdf
Size: 2 MB

Board Response to IRP report (updated July 2018)

Type: pdf
Size: 371 KB


Type: pdf
Size: 913 KB

The Review - Timelines for governance consultation

Type: msword
Size: 90 KB

The Review - Proposed Scope of the Review (updated October 2, 2017)

Type: vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 61 KB

GRG - Terms of Reference

Type: vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 2 MB

GRG - Meeting minutes (September 8, 2017)

Type: pdf
Size: 270 KB

IRP - Timeline for tender

Type: vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 14 KB